Effectiveness Comparison of Visual and Semantic Features for Noise Image Removal
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Effectiveness Comparison of Visual and Semantic Features for Noise Image Removal
This paper describes the effectiveness comparison of noise removal method using visual, semantic and the both features. To automatically generate image dataset from Web, noise image removal should be conducted. Visual and semantic features are available to detect noise images. However, which type of features, and how to combine the two types of feature are unraveled. In this paper, six types of...
متن کاملon the comparison of keyword and semantic-context methods of learning new vocabulary meaning
the rationale behind the present study is that particular learning strategies produce more effective results when applied together. the present study tried to investigate the efficiency of the semantic-context strategy alone with a technique called, keyword method. to clarify the point, the current study seeked to find answer to the following question: are the keyword and semantic-context metho...
15 صفحه اولcomparison of zoe and vitapex for canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولeffectiveness of hedstroum files and rotary k3 instruments in removal of obturation materials during retreatment in curved canals
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولPATIL, RAJWADE: POISSON NOISE REMOVAL FOR IMAGE DEMOSAICING 1 Poisson Noise Removal for Image Demosaicing
With increasing resolution of the sensors in camera detector arrays, acquired images are ever more susceptible to perturbations that appear as grainy artifacts called ‘noise’. In real acquisitions, the dominant noise model has been shown to follow the Poisson distribution, which is signal dependent. Most color image cameras today acquire only one out of the R, G, B values per pixel by means of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Procedia Computer Science
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1877-0509
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.153